‘It’s devastating’: the way thirty confined white whales are being used as tools in dispute over animal cruelty.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an adorable small “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.
Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned discussion over their future often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who work with them regularly.
After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the authorities covers the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer discovered personally.
Burgess spent several years as a beluga trainer, a position that required gaining confidence of the sea creatures.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.
“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive relationships.”
Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.
The park did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but earlier stated: “The whales … get far better medical attention and constant care than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
Burgess was fired from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park thought particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any plans to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “considerable manpower”, trucks and specialized tools.
“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for requests for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the application would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reveal a broader incorrect perception of the circumstances of life for belugas raised in confinement.
“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion
As officials work to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.
A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has proven most controversial. The future facility, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.
Different voices say the prospect of a refuge reflects a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the near future.
An official, director of the initiative, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|