🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.