🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, may align too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. Although he is called Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country de facto.

• His list included various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. His harder interpretation led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.